Ambidextrous means using both hands with equal skill, a handy term for RPR learners.

Which term best describes someone who is skilled at using both hands?

• A. Ambidextrous
• B. Acrimonious
• C. Affidavit
• D. Adjudicator

Answer: (A)

The term that best describes someone who is skilled at using both hands is "ambidextrous." This word specifically refers to the ability to use both hands with equal skill, which is a rare trait in individuals. People who are ambidextrous can perform tasks such as writing, throwing, or playing musical instruments with either hand equally well. The other terms listed have entirely different meanings. For instance, "acrimonious" describes something that is bitter or angry, often used in the context of relationships or debates. "Affidavit" refers to a written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation, used in legal contexts. "Adjudicator," on the other hand, refers to a person who makes a formal judgment or decision, often in a legal or competition setting. These definitions highlight why "ambidextrous" is the only choice that directly pertains to the ability to use both hands effectively.

Ambidextrous, Acrimonious, Affidavit, Adjudicator: a quick vocabulary snapshot for the RPR world

Let me ask you something: in a courtroom or deposition transcript, does one well-chosen word ever make the difference between a clear record and a muddled one? The answer is yes. It’s the kind of moment that makes vocabulary more than just nerdy trivia. It’s the backbone of accuracy, which is what RPR-certified reporters bring to every room.

Ambidextrous: what the word means and why it matters

Here’s the thing about ambidextrous: it describes someone who can use both hands with equal skill. That’s a physical trait, yes, but in the context of the RPR vocabulary that trait becomes a metaphor for balance and versatility. A reporter who can “handle both sides of the page” when taking notes—figuratively speaking—knows how to adapt to fast talk, to speakers who switch pace, or to a crowded courtroom where documents shift from table to table.

In plain language, ambidextrous means you’re equally comfortable with right or left, with pen or keyboard, with a sharp memory of what’s said and a steady hand in jotting it down. It’s not a common trait, but in transcripts you’ll see it pop up enough to become familiar. People who understand this term can picture a witness who can be asked to demonstrate something with either hand, or a note-taker who can pivot without skipping a beat. That clarity translates into cleaner, more precise records.

Other terms that often show up in the same neighborhood

If ambidextrous is the star in this little vocabulary scene, three other terms often appear in the same conversations. Here are quick, practical definitions you can keep in your mental toolbox:

• Acrimonious: this word describes temperature in a dispute—bitter, harsh, and peevish. You might hear it in arguments about contracts or in testimony where parties are far from friendly. Example in a sentence: “The exchange became acrimonious after the objection was sustained.” It signals mood and tone, which matters when you’re transcribing or interpreting intent.

• Affidavit: a written, sworn statement used in legal settings. Think of it as a document you might encounter in civil cases or during evidence collection. Example: “The plaintiff filed an affidavit, swearing to the truth of the statements.” It’s a staple here because accuracy of terms keeps a record credible.

• Adjudicator: a person who makes a formal decision or judgment, often in disputes, competitions, or administrative reviews. In transcripts you’ll see this word when a ruling is discussed or when the role of the decision-maker is named. Example: “The adjudicator ruled in favor of the defendant after considering all the testimony.”

Why these words belong in your mental glossary

Here’s the practical upshot: exams, transcripts, and real-world records reward precise vocabulary. When a term clearly fits a context, you reduce ambiguity and you help readers—attorneys, judges, and clients—follow the thread of the story. Ambidextrous, acrimonious, affidavit, and adjudicator aren’t just trivia. They’re everyday tools for describing people, actions, and moods with exactness.

A few quick strategies to strengthen your recall

If you’re building a mental dictionary for the exam and for real-world work, try these friendly approaches. They keep things approachable and memorable without turning into a grind.

• Learn by context, not just by memory. When you read a sample paragraph or a transcript snippet, underline terms you don’t know and write a one-sentence definition next to them. Then make a tiny sentence of your own that uses the word in a legal-ish moment.

• Use contrasts. For each word, think of a word that’s its opposite or a word that’s often confused with it. For example, acrimonious often sits opposite from cordial in tone. This helps you sense nuance.

• Create micro-flashcards. A card on one side says the term; the other side gives a simple, practical definition and a courtroom example. Revisit them in short bursts—five minutes here, a couple of times a week.

• Read with a purpose. When you’re browsing court documents or transcripts, note unfamiliar terms and follow them up with a quick check on a reliable dictionary. Seeing the word in use, then confirming its meaning, cements it more than a single definition in isolation.

• Tie words to real tools. A reliable desk companion like Merriam-Webster or the Cambridge Dictionary online makes it easy to confirm spellings and nuances. If you’re a tech fan, some dictionary apps even offer quick quizzes you can take between recordings.

Making connections that matter in everyday work

The vocabulary you’re studying isn’t just for tests. It’s the language you’ll lean on when you’re in the room, when you’re listening to a deposition, when you’re typing notes, or when you’re proofreading a transcript for accuracy. The more comfortable you are with terms like ambidextrous, the better you’ll be at following the speaker, predicting what might come next, and catching subtle shifts in meaning.

Think of it this way: a courtroom is a stage, and language is the script. The better your lines, the smoother the performance. A term like ambidextrous isn’t flashy, but it’s precise. It helps you describe a capability without getting tangled in a long explanation. In the same breath, knowing acrimonious can help you convey the vibe of a tense moment without embellishment. An affidavit anchors a statement in formality and legality, which matters when you’re ensuring the record stands up under scrutiny. An adjudicator, finally, gives you a clear picture of who’s responsible for deciding outcomes in the scene you’re recording.

Let’s wander a moment into a small digression that still stays on point

If you’ve ever tried to explain a busy day to a friend, you know how easy it is for detail to blur. You might say: “There was a lot going on—people shouting, papers shuffling, a judge looking over documents.” Now imagine the same story condensed into a single, precise paragraph for a transcript. That’s the daily magic you’re aiming for: clear, faithful, and efficient communication. Vocabulary is your elevator pitch for that clarity. The more you can summon the right word at the right moment, the more confident you’ll sound when you sit down to transcribe or review a clip.

A few more practical notes to keep in mind

• It’s okay to pause and think. If a word isn’t landing, take a breath, recall a related term, or look up a quick definition. You don’t need to memorize every nuance in one sitting.

• Notice the rhythm of terms. Some words feel formal, others conversational. In transcripts, both kinds show up. Knowing when to choose a formal term (like affidavit) versus a more plain description helps keep the record natural and precise.

• Don’t fear the long trail of synonyms. If ambidextrous isn’t the exact fit in a sentence, you can often replace it with a more neutral phrase that keeps the sense intact. The goal is accuracy, not sticking to a single vocabulary habit.

• Practice with real-world text. If you have access to actual depositions, hearing or reading them aloud can reveal how terms function in flow and cadence. It’s a kind of soft rehearsal that pays off when you’re in the room.

The bigger takeaway: precision beats guesswork

In the end, the most valuable skill isn’t just knowing a handful of terms. It’s building a flexible vocabulary that helps you capture speech with clarity, even when the pace is brisk or the mood is charged. Ambidextrous is a neat example because it’s specific and memorable. It also serves as a reminder that language, like a good stenography setup, should be adaptable and reliable under pressure.

If you’re curious, you’ll find more words in everyday transcripts that carry weight, nuance, and color. The more you’re comfortable with terms like ambidextrous and its companions, the more you’ll notice how often precise language makes a record easier to read and more trustworthy to those who rely on it.

A closing thought to carry with you

Every session, every new term, every little definition you tuck away is a part of your skill set. The record you help create doesn’t just capture words—it preserves the truth of a moment. That’s a powerful incentive to keep exploring vocabulary with curiosity and care. If you ever stumble on a tricky term, remember: the right meaning is your ally, and clarity is your voice. And with a little steady effort, you’ll feel that confidence rise, sentence by sentence, page by page.